

MLS Communism Kills Kandji Deal (UPDATE AGAIN!)
By: Dave Martinez | August 28th, 2008
Just when you thought the league turned the corner on ridiculous rules and regulations, we get this - MLS has blocked Red Bulls transfer of Atlanta Silverback standout, Kandji.
Grandfathering Carlos Ruiz is fine.
Grandfathering Landon Donovan? No problem Beckha . . . I mean Galaxy.
Allowing teams to label bogus discovery claims on players they have no intention of signing? Hunky Dory.
But not allowing the Red Bulls to use $200k of their own money, earned in deals like Jozy to Villarreal, which have lined the pockets of many an MLS official, is an absolute atrocity. Its a step backwards. Its unfair. Its downright Communism at its ugliest.
The Bulls developed Jozy, put money into infrastructure, player development, player signings - you name it, the Red Bull organization has earned its money here (whatever has been made!). Who has the right tell an organization what to do with its money, especially when they are playing within the convoluted rules? Is it because its a USL player? Or is this a feable attempt to protect smaller market teams from feeling jipped, since they do not have the funds of the Red Bulls Conglomerate? Come on now.
This is wrong on so many levels. But the one underlying message in all of this that I am getting is simple - MLS does not respect itself enough to believe that one of its own can handle a 200k transfer gamble. And that is a sad state of affairs for those of us who are under the illusions that MLS is becoming a world class league.
Its time to take the plunge MLS. Small steps like allowing the Red Bulls to use their money at their own discretion will build the credibility of the league, not only domestically, but worldwide. Blocking these moves just reinforces the image of MLS as a small, tepid yet totalitarion and fragile league. And these are small steps ladies and gentlemen - George Steinbrenner scratches his nose and 200K fall out.
Take the plunge MLS. Believe in your ownership. Allow teams more freedom. Its time to start letting go.
UPDATE: 4:30PM
- Metrofanatic.com was able to reach Ivan Gazidis, MLS Deputy Commissioner, for his comments on this move. He denied that MLS ever rejected any deal, and basically chalked it up to new media hype - “and of course blogs are driven by hits, not necessarily by the same standards as print media.” Check out what Metrofanatic has learned - click here!
UPDATE: 7:30PM
- I was watching GolTV, and according to their report, it was the Red Bulls who thought that 200K would be too much to spend for a partial season transfer fee, and withdrew! Believe what you will?
UPDATE 9:30pm
Ives sticks to the original story and sources. In a big way. Check it out!
![]() |
MLS Forums | NYRB Results |
Subscribe
|
Print
|
Share
![]() |
Comments | Add your comment
-



One of the commenters got it right over at S-B-I. This is really all about the MLS sending a message to the players and the USL. Saying the MLS is your only option if you want to be serious about playing professional soccer, and don’t bother hoping to transfer in/make money on transferring your talent.
Posted from
United States

-



I hear ya, but after years of back and forth transactions between the league, NOW MLS wants to prove some kind of a point? USL isnt even competition at this point (no offense) to the MLS product. It would be petty and even now, after all this, and unbelievable reason to pull this kind of garbage out.
Posted from
United States

-



yeah, but 200,000 is probably a lot for an “unproven” talent. The reality of the MLS is they really can’t let teams spend money every way they want until there is a consistent and equal(ish) stream of money flowing to all of the teams.
Posted from
United States

-



don’t get me wrong..I wanted Kanji…and i think we should be allowed to spend the 200k, but its the MLS and I’m not shocked
Posted from
United States

-



But that gets back to my point - Red Bulls have scouted Kanji and found him to be worth a risk, as any club would do anywhere else around the world. MLS feels that type of investment on an unproven quantity is above the teams paygrade. Hence, they do not believe their current crop of owners are capable of spotting diamonds ever. Its an insult to owners league round to me.
Posted from
United States

-



Blocking the Kanji transfer is another two-steps-back for MLS. Dumb move. Got to reform this monolithic approach to things eventually, right?
Posted from
United States

-



how about this for thought:
Atlanta is a prime target for MLS expansion: maybe they don’t want Atlanta giving away all of their good players before 2010?
Just thinking outloud herePosted from
United States

-



Atlanta will now sell him to a league overseas and buy about 7 MLS players with the money they make. Dumb move, MLS.
This isn’t about Atlanta moving to MLS. Kandji won’t be back in Atlanta next year. It is about MLS not wanting to give any money to a league that it competes with for lower end players. It is also about MLS being tied to Adidas and USL being owned by Nike/Umbro.
Posted from
United States

-



Bob sheds the light. Its just a sad situation overall that is surely leaving MLS fans scratching their collective brains out . . .
Posted from
United States

-



Don’t compare communism to the pathetic administration of the Galaxy Show, uhh, I mean MLS.
Posted from
Canada

-



Is it putting down communism?
Posted from
United States

-



Sheez! They as a rule, avoid transfer fees, like the plague. I know for a fact in Feb., they COULD have had our dynamic forward in hand, whom happened to be Colombian no less, but would not pony up the funds! I am STILL ticked at them, that the wealthiest country on the globe, contracted 2 beloved teams, in a knee jerk reaction, after 2001. They make it hard to be a fan!
Posted from
United States

-



Okay, read the update…I feel bad for JCO, as I know he was handcuffed financially, back in Feb. and maybe again now…with all the Redbull sold, to be mixed w/vodka on So. Beach alone, would pay for these guys to play, lol…Alright, we take it back MLS, but I am still ticked about my beloved Supporters Shield Fusion!
Posted from
United States

-



Red Bull Vodka! Excellent idea! We can raise more money with those, and have MLS reject its use! lol. I am waiting to see what happens with all of this.
Posted from
United States

-



Fucking amazing! Transfer fees are ok when players are headed overseas but coming to MLS - no thank you!
Im really stunned that the league would make an example here where we are talking peanuts! 200K!!! Its an embarassment! Thats the kind of money High Shool football teams pay a coach!
This is supposed to be a professional league and they are going to balk at 200K? I dont care if its Adidas vs Nike / MLS vs USL. There is no way a 200K transfer fee registers on either company’s profits at all. thats a pittance!
Clearly its a continued effort to shield small markets and protect the league from their worst fear … namely another Cosmos-esque bankrupting of the league.
But times have changed and this is a peanuts deal. I guess not when compared to the poor bastards payed 17K for the season but thats another travesty!
Anyway if a team cant improve itself via signings and developments then this isnt a sport. If its only ok for the MLS to make money in transfers not to see it spent then this is a shell game disguised as a sport.
Im far less concerned about the acquisition of the player himself and infuriated that a fledgling league that Ive made efforts to support and excuse is acting like a government run bureaucracy in the 3rd world. I expect Kafka to be the commissioner of the MLS with this kind of bizzarity!
fuck that.
{please excuse my temper tantrum}
Posted from
United States

-



ok, interesting update.
Are they backpedaling or was it BS? Hard to say. I wouldn’t put it past them to change their minds based on fan reaction and then pretend it never happened.
Its not like anyone doesn’t see this kind of act as in character for MLS after all.
Posted from
United States

-



NLR - youve been around here long enough to know temper tantrums have a home on the Red Bulls Offside - rereading my post, I think I had one myself!
Posted from
United States

-



AAaaaaaagggggrrrrrrrggggahhahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[/freakout]
ahhh, home sweet home.
Posted from
United States

-



NLR - did you check out my latest update? If so, I understand the reaction.
Posted from
United States

-



One has to really wonder. Perhaps its true that 200k is too rich for one of the biggest markets in the US or perhaps Kandji isnt worth it to the RBs {I dont know if he is or isnt} and perhaps its all BS PR!!!
one really has to wonder with this league though.
Posted from
United States

-



Its a shame - the general lack of transparancy in the MLS power structure breeds these kinds of rumors. From injuries to salary cap, fans are left largely in the dark and are made to assume the absolute worst (based on past questionable decisions and rulings). With now 3 different and credible sources reporting 3 distinctly different things, we will probably just have to wait till tommorrow to sort all this trash out.
And I thought it would be a slow news day . . .
Posted from
United States

-



and all we want is a striker with promise to offset the losses of our home grown Jozy and our all-MLS signing of Angel
is that so much to ask?
Posted from
United States

-



I actually was arguing this point a few posts back. MLS needs to do the right thing and let a team that is owned by an independent company buy and sell and spend how it pleases. This happens everywhere else why not here?
Posted from
United States

Leave a Reply
If you have not commented here before, please take a moment to peruse ourCommenting Guidelines.













